House Votes to Not Study $44 trillion cost of climate change

Greenhouse gas emissions increased 2.3% in 2013, mainly because of large increases in China and India, according to the Global Carbon Project. A World Bank report states that we’re headed toward a four degrees centigrade warmer world by the end of the century with no certainty that humans can adapt to extreme heat waves, loss of agricultural land, and sea-level rise that will jeopardize major cities.[i] Citibank predicted it will cost $44 trillion to mitigate the disastrous effects of climate change by 2060, the same year (2015) that the House of Representatives voted to keep the EPA from considering the costs. [ii]The poor are most harmed by climate change; a group of journalists documents the impact of climate change on poor girls and women.[iii]

[i] Naomi Klein, “One Way or Another, Everything Changes,” book excerpt from This Changes Everything, TruthDig, September 17, 2014.

http://www.truthdig.com/arts_culture/item/one_way_or_another_everything_changes_20140917

[ii] Samantha Page, “House Votes to Keep EPA From Considering Costs of Climate Change, Climate Progress, September 27, 2015.

http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/09/27/3705860/social-cost-of-carbon-must-remain-uncalculated/

[iii] http://archive.rippleeffectimages.org/

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s